On CSO Participation and Safety Considerations for ADB Annual Meeting 2026
- Apr 13
- 3 min read
April 10, 2026
Mr. Masato Kanda
President
Asian Development Bank
Dear Pres. Kanda,
Good day.
We are writing to express our concerns regarding our civil society network’s participation in the upcoming Asian Development Bank Annual Meeting 2026 in Samarkand, Uzbekistan. In light of the current Middle East conflict and the risks associated with travel, we, as NGO Forum on ADB have decided to join the annual meeting through a hybrid format of both online and onsite participation with a clear agenda to minimise the risk associated with international travel for our members and staff.
We note with concern the ADB’s command decision to still proceed with the Annual Meeting in Uzbekistan despite the ongoing conflict, which has impacted airport connectivity, raised ticket prices, and created general uncertainty amid sudden shifts in the geopolitical landscape. We consider this decision to proceed with the meeting in Uzbekistan to be ‘high risk’ and it directly jeopardises the safety of not only civil society members but also ADB staff, as well as all delegates and guests travelling internationally to the meeting. Mr President, we, as the NGO Forum on ADB, urge your office and the senior management of the ADB to reconsider and shift the Annual Meeting away from Uzbekistan to a safer, more accessible location.
In the event the ADB continues with its current plans, on behalf of civil society groups and affected communities, we strongly recommend the ADB to take concrete steps to ensure full, meaningful and secure online participation for civil society organisations (CSOs), especially in key sessions relevant to CSOs and affected communities. This should include ensuring interpretation and translation in major languages to enable broader participation. These include—
CSO-led sessions -
Structural challenges to safeguards implementation and accountability mechanism operations at ADB
ADB’s Commitment to a Just Transition and Paris Alignment
Dialogue Between ADB’s Independent Evaluation Department and Civil Society Organisations
Meeting between Civil Society Organizations and ADB Senior Management
These sessions are critical spaces for engagement, accountability, and dialogue with communities affected by ADB-supported projects. Ensuring accessible online participation at convenient times is essential to uphold ADB’s commitments to transparency, inclusiveness, and stakeholder engagement. At the same time, given the hybrid format, it is equally important to ensure the safety of on-site CSO participants—particularly those from the region—through clear precautionary measures and comprehensive emergency and security plans that go beyond standard venue access controls.
ADB has demonstrated during the COVID-19 period that such hybrid arrangements are both feasible and effective. Given the present circumstances, it is both reasonable and necessary to ensure that these measures are in place so that no stakeholder is excluded.
We hope the ADB will consider all our recommendations with utmost sincerity and take the necessary decisions and steps to ensure safe, inclusive, and meaningful participation for all stakeholders and guests in this year’s ADB Annual Governors Meeting.
Respectfully,
Rayyan Hassan
Executive Director
NGO Forum on ADB
Cc:
Vice-President (Administration and Corporate Management)
Director General, Climate Change and Sustainable Development Department (CCSD)
Senior Director, Energy Sector Office
Head, Office of Safeguards
Director General, Independent Evaluation Department
Chair, Compliance Review Panel (CRP), Office of the (OCRP)
Special Project Facilitator
Head, NGO and Civil Society Center
ALL Executive Director
ALL Alternate Executive Director
ENDORSED BY -
AbibiNsroma Foundation, Ghana
Aksi! for Gender, Social and Ecological Justice, Indonesia
Alternative Law Collective, Pakistan
Alyansa Tigil Mina (ATM), Philippines
Asian Forum for Human Rights and Development (FORUM-ASIA), Asia (Regional)
Asian Peoples’ Movement on Debt and Development (APMDD), Regional
Bangladesh Food Security Network (KHANI), Bangladesh
Bangladesh Working Group on Ecology and Development (BWGED), Bangladesh
Bank Climate Advocates, United States
Centre for Community Mobilization and Support NGO, Armenia
Centre for Environmental Justice (CEJ), Sri Lanka
CLEAN (Coastal Livelihood and Environmental Action Network), Bangladesh
Community Empowerment and Social Justice (CEMSOJ) Network, Nepal
Community Resource Centre, Thailand
Eco-Coalition Armenia, Armenia
Equitable Cambodia, Cambodia
External Aid Monitoring Group, Kyrgyzstan
Forum on Ecology and Development (FED), Bangladesh
Freedom from Debt Coalition, Philippines
Global Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives (GAIA), Asia-Pacific
Growthwatch, India
Indian Social Action Forum (INSAF), India
Indus Consrtium, Pakistan
Inisiasi Masyarakat Adat (IMA), Indonesia
Japan Center for a Sustainable Environment and Society (JACSES), Japan
Jubilee Australia Research Centre, Australia
Kazakhstan International Bureau for Human Rights and Rule of Law, Kazakhstan
Mekong Watch, Japan
Nash Vek Public Foundation, Kyrgyzstan
Oyu Tolgoi Watch, Mongolia
Pakistan Fisherfolk Forum, Pakistan
Participatory Research and Action Network (PRAAN), Bangladesh
Peace Point Development Foundation (PPDF), Nigeria
Quest for Growth and Development Foundation, Nigeria
Reality of Aid – Asia Pacific, Philippines
Recourse, The Netherlands
Rivers & Rights, Southeast Asia (Regional)
Rivers without Boundaries, Mongolia
South Asia Just Transition Alliance (SAJTA), Bangladesh
The Bretton Woods Project, United Kingdom
Trend Asia, Indonesia
Urgewald, Germany
Uzbek Forum for Human Rights, Germany


