Request for formal inclusion of key civil society topics in the 2026 AIIB Annual Meeting Agenda
- NGO Forum on ADB

- 2 hours ago
- 5 min read
December 11, 2025
Executive Directors and Senior ManagementAsian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB)Beijing, People’s Republic of China
Subject: Request for formal inclusion of key civil society topics in the 2026 AIIB Annual Meeting Agenda
Dear Executive Directors and Members of Management,
On behalf of the NGO Forum on ADB and our network of partner civil society organisations (CSOs) engaged in critical monitoring of the AIIB through the AIIB Working Group, we respectfully request the formal inclusion of a set of priority topics in the official program of the 2026 AIIB Annual Meeting (AM).
Over the past years, AIIB has become a significant actor in Asia’s infrastructure and energy landscape, with growing influence over capital markets, country pipelines, and national development pathways. At the same time, affected communities, movements, and CSOs increasingly view the AIIB Annual Meeting as one of the few venues where lived experience, technical scrutiny, and public interest concerns can be communicated directly to the Bank. To meet this expectation, we believe the 2026 AM in Doha, Qatar, should move beyond being a showcase event and instead operate as a substantive forum where critical issues are aired openly and followed up through clear, accountable processes.
In this context, we put forward the following topics for formal inclusion as sessions, technical briefings, and CSO–AIIB dialogues in the 2026 agenda-
First, we request the inclusion of a technical session on capital markets. The AIIB’s private capital mobilisation through capital markets instruments—such as bonds and infrastructure asset-backed securities (IABS)—has significant implications for debt sustainability, transparency, and public accountability. As the Bank increases its use of these instruments, a clearer understanding of its capital-markets approach, risk appetite, and safeguards for social and environmental integrity is essential. A dedicated technical dialogue, involving AIIB Treasury and risk management staff together with external experts, would enhance public understanding of these operations. CSOs are particularly concerned that capital-markets activities may dilute project-level accountability, and seek clarity on what mechanisms AIIB will put in place to prevent such outcomes.
Second, we call for a dedicated session on AIIB’s energy finance. While the Bank presents its portfolio as “green” and “lean,” communities often face displacement, livelihood disruptions, and cumulative ecological impacts from large-scale solar, wind, and hydropower investments. A session that addresses concrete social and environmental harms, benefit-sharing, and grievance resolution in AIIB-financed energy projects would demonstrate serious engagement with just-transition principles. The session should also examine AIIB’s support for gas infrastructure and its compatibility with the Paris Agreement and 1.5°C pathways. Many CSOs remain deeply concerned that continued gas financing risks long-term fossil lock-in. A technical discussion grounded in AIIB’s energy strategy, pipeline, and transition scenarios is necessary to clarify how the Bank intends to phase down such exposure.
Third, we propose that AIIB and CEIU publish and explain an early advocacy plan and timeline for the Annual Meeting and relevant policy reviews. CSO engagement is frequently constrained by short consultation windows. A transparent calendar—covering draft policy releases, comment periods, CEIU learning events, and PPM-related outreach—would enable more meaningful participation from communities that require time to understand complex documents and prepare feedback.
Fourth, we request a substantive session on gender that goes beyond high-level commitments. CSOs and gender-justice advocates wish to raise technical questions on how the Gender Action Plan (GAP) is implemented, how gender analysis is conducted, how intersectional risks are assessed, how gender-based violence (GBV) risks are managed in infrastructure projects, and how gender indicators are monitored and independently verified. A detailed session with adequate time for questions would help shift gender policy from aspiration to practice.
Fifth, we urge the Bank to include a session on transparency in country and project selection and resource allocation. Communities and national CSOs often have no access to information on how countries are prioritized, how projects enter the pipeline, and how resources are distributed across regions and sectors. An open session in which AIIB explains its country engagement frameworks, pipeline development process, and allocation criteria—along with space for CSOs to ask questions and provide feedback—would be an important step toward improving meaningful public scrutiny.
We also strongly recommend that the 2026 AM improve CSO engagement by explicitly allowing CSO-led panels within the official program. CSOs should not be limited to side events. A clear process for reviewing and integrating CSO-led proposals—especially on themes such as energy transition, human rights, climate justice, and accountability—would align AIIB with emerging good practice across other multilateral development banks.
We believe that formally including these topics in the 2026 Annual Meeting agenda will strengthen AIIB’s credibility as a public institution subject to scrutiny and responsive to community concerns. NGO Forum on ADB and our partners will continue to provide independent evidence from project sites across Asia to support accountability in AIIB operations.
We respectfully request a written response from AIIB Management and the Board of Directors indicating how these proposals will be considered in planning the 2026 Annual Meeting, and through which channels CSOs may continue to engage on agenda-setting.
Thank you for your consideration. We hope the 2026 AIIB Annual Meeting reflects the principles of accountability, justice, and inclusive dialogue that affected communities and CSOs continue to call for.
Sincerely,
Rayyan HassanExecutive DirectorNGO Forum on ADB
ENDORSED BY:
350 Pilipinas, Philippines
AbibiNsroma Foundation, Ghana
Accountability Counsel, International
Adarsha Samajik Progoti Sangstha, Bangladesh
African Law Foundation (AFRILAW), Nigeria
Aksi! for gender, social, and ecological justice, Indonesia
Alyansa Tigil Mina (ATM), Philippines
Asian Forum for Human Rights and Development (FORUM-ASIA), Regional, Asia
Bank Climate Advocates, United States / International
Bantay Kita, Inc., Philippines
BRICS Feminist Watch, Global
Buliisa Initiative for Rural Development Organisation (BIRUDO), Uganda
Centre for Community Mobilization and Support, Armenia
Centre for Environmental Justice, Sri Lanka
Centre for Human Rights and Development (CHRD), Mongolia
Community Resource Centre (CRC), Thailand
COMPPART Foundation for Justice and Peacebuilding, Nigeria
Consumer NGO, Mongolia
Dawei Probono Lawyer Network, Dawei, Tanintharyi, Myanmar
debtWATCH Indonesia, Indonesia/Southeast Asia
Equitable Cambodia, Cambodia
Fundación CAUCE: Cultura Ambiental - Causa Ecologista, Argentina
Fundeps, Argentina
Growthwatch, India
Inisiasi Masyarakat Adat (IMA), Indonesia
International Accountability Project, Global
Jubilee Australia Research Centre, Australia
Latinoamérica Sustentable, Latin America
Lumière Synergie pour le Développement, Sénégal
Mangrove Action Project, USA
Mekong Watch, Japan
Nash Vek PF, Kyrgyzstan
Onnochitra Foundation, Mymensingh, Bangladesh
Oyu Tolgoi Watch, Mongolia
Pakistan Fisherfolk Forum, Pakistan
Peace Point Development Foundation - PPDF, Nigeria
Programme on Women's Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (PWESCR), Global South
Recourse, The Netherlands
Rivers & Rights, Southeast Asia
Rivers without Boundaries International Coalition, International
Rivers without Boundaries Coalition, Mongolia
Sa Merdeka Foundation, Flores, East Nusa Tenggara - Indonesia
Society for Peace and Sustainable Development, PAKISTAN
Society of Development and Education for Small Households-SoDESH, Bangladesh
South Asia Just Transition Alliance (SAJTA), South Asia
Southern Initiatives, Dawei, Tanintharyi, Myanmar
Stiftung Asienhaus, Germany
Sustentarse, Chile
Urgewald, Germany
Uzbek Forum for Human Rights, Germany/Uzbekistan
Youth for Promotion of Development (YPD), Cameroon

