Ensuring AIIB’s civil society engagement legacy continues under the next President
- NGO Forum on ADB

- 2 hours ago
- 5 min read
December 10, 2025
Mr. Jin Liqun
President
Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB)Beijing, People’s Republic of China
Re: Ensuring AIIB’s civil society engagement legacy continues under the next President
Dear President Jin,
On behalf of the Forum network, along with our partner organisations and communities that have engaged with the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) since its inception, we are writing to express our appreciation for the space you have helped create for dialogue between AIIB and civil society. We would also like to respectfully seek your support in ensuring that this legacy is carried forward and strengthened by the Bank’s next President in the years to come.
Over the years, from the early Annual Meetings through the virtual and hybrid formats of 2020–2023, civil society organisations and project-affected communities have repeatedly raised concerns with AIIB on issues such as gender, safeguards, energy policy, information disclosure, accountability, and civic space. While we have often been critical and direct in highlighting these issues, we recognise that under your leadership, AIIB has taken meaningful steps to engage with these concerns:
Convening management–CSO dialogues around the Annual Meetings
Meeting with CSOs to discuss the AIIB project and policy issues directly with you around the World Bank-IMF Spring Meetings
Allocating time for exchanges with departments like the Compliance, Effectiveness, and Integrity Unit (CEIU), and
Being open to receiving and acknowledging civil society correspondence on the Environmental and Social Framework, the Energy Sector Strategy, the Gender Action Plan, and the design of the Project-affected People’s Mechanism.
Although these spaces have not always been sufficient and there remains a long way to go before engagement can be considered fully “meaningful” for communities on the frontline of AIIB-backed projects, it is significant from our perspective as longstanding critics and advocacy groups engaging multilateral development banks that there is a willingness, during your presidency, to sit in the same room—whether physically or virtually—and hear uncomfortable truths directly from affected persons and their allies.
Looking ahead to a presidential transition in 2026, we kindly request that you, as the current President, formally and publicly recommend that civil society engagement be recognised as a core pillar of the Bank’s governance culture, not just as an optional add-on dependent on individual leadership.
Specifically, we respectfully recommend that you consider the following steps-
Affirm to the Board of Governors and Board of Directors—in writing—that structured engagement with civil society and project-affected communities is essential to AIIB’s legitimacy, effectiveness, and risk management. This affirmation could include a clear expectation that future Presidents will maintain and strengthen regular high-level dialogues with CSOs before and during Annual Meetings.
Recommend that the Terms of Reference and selection criteria for the next President explicitly include a commitment to meaningful civil society engagement. A President who values listening to frontline voices and views CSOs as partners in accountability—rather than adversaries—will be better positioned to guide AIIB through increasingly complex social, environmental, and geopolitical challenges.
Encourage AIIB Management to institutionalize—not just for the duration of your term but for the long term—robust and reliable channels for engagement with CSOs and affected communities, both formal and informal. This could include: establishing at least one dedicated management–CSO dialogue at every Annual Meeting; integrating civil society–led thematic panels into the official program; facilitating project-level meetings between AIIB staff and directly affected communities; and ensuring safe participation, interpretation, hybrid formats, and accessible registration processes so that individuals with limited resources, connectivity, or language proficiency are not excluded.
Emphasise that engagement must extend beyond events and include meaningful follow-up. We would welcome your support in reinforcing that management and project teams should respond to inputs from CSOs and communities in a timely and substantive manner throughout the year, and that the Project-affected People’s Mechanism becomes and remains secure, accessible, independent, and trusted by those seeking remedies.
This request is offered in the spirit of the constructive dialogue that has characterised many of our exchanges under your leadership. While we have consistently raised concerns about AIIB’s exposure to fossil fuels, its financial intermediary lending, and gaps in safeguards implementation, as well as access to information, we also recognise the value of maintaining open channels for honest discussion. Such dialogue—even when viewpoints diverge—is essential for an institution to learn from experience, address shortcomings, and prevent future harms to people and ecosystems.
For the countless communities across Asia, Africa, Latin America, and the Arab region living with the impacts of large infrastructure and financial sector projects, whether AIIB’s next President continues this engagement is not merely a procedural matter. It is about whether people’s voices will be included in decisions affecting their rights, land, livelihoods, and futures.
We therefore encourage you, President Jin, to use this transitional moment to signal clearly to your successor and to AIIB’s shareholders that meaningful dialogue with civil society and affected communities is not merely consistent with AIIB’s vision of “lean, clean, and green” development—it is fundamental to achieving it.
We sincerely thank you for the dialogue opportunities provided during your tenure, and we hope to see this commitment not only continued but strengthened—deeper, broader, and more closely connected to those most affected by AIIB’s investments.
With respect,
Rayyan Hassan
Executive Director
NGO Forum on ADB
Endorsed by the following organizations:
350 Pilipinas, Philippines
AbibiNsroma Foundation, Ghana
Accountability Counsel, International
Adarsha Samajik Progoti Sangstha, Bangladesh
African Law Foundation (AFRILAW), Nigeria
Aksi! for gender, social, and ecological justice, Indonesia
Alyansa Tigil Mina (ATM), Philippines
Asian Forum for Human Rights and Development (FORUM-ASIA), Regional, Asia
Bank Climate Advocates, United States / International
Bantay Kita, Inc., Philippines
BRICS Feminist Watch, Global
Buliisa Initiative for Rural Development Organisation (BIRUDO), Uganda
Centre for Community Mobilization and Support, Armenia
Centre for Environmental Justice, Sri Lanka
Centre for Human Rights and Development (CHRD), Mongolia
Community Resource Centre (CRC), Thailand
COMPPART Foundation for Justice and Peacebuilding, Nigeria
Consumer NGO, Mongolia
Dawei Probono Lawyer Network, Dawei, Tanintharyi, Myanmar
debtWATCH Indonesia, Indonesia/Southeast Asia
Equitable Cambodia, Cambodia
Fundación CAUCE: Cultura Ambiental - Causa Ecologista, Argentina
Fundeps, Argentina
Growthwatch, India
Inisiasi Masyarakat Adat (IMA), Indonesia
International Accountability Project, Global
Jubilee Australia Research Centre, Australia
Latinoamérica Sustentable, Latin America
Lumière Synergie pour le Développement, Sénégal
Mangrove Action Project, USA
Mekong Watch, Japan
Nash Vek PF, Kyrgyzstan
Onnochitra Foundation, Mymensingh, Bangladesh
Oyu Tolgoi Watch, Mongolia
Pakistan Fisherfolk Forum, Pakistan
Peace Point Development Foundation - PPDF, Nigeria
Programme on Women's Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (PWESCR), Global South
Recourse, The Netherlands
Rivers without Boundaries Coalition, Mongolia
Sa Merdeka Foundation, Flores, East Nusa Tenggara - Indonesia
Society for Peace and Sustainable Development, Pakistan
Society of Development and Education for Small Households-SoDESH, Bangladesh
South Asia Just Transition Alliance (SAJTA), South Asia
Southern Initiatives, Dawei, Tanintharyi, Myanmar
Stiftung Asienhaus, Germany
Sustentarse, Chile
Urgewald, Germany
Uzbek Forum for Human Rights, Germany/Uzbekistan
Youth for Promotion of Development (YPD), Cameroon


